Tag Archives: LexCounsel Law Offices

ILN Today Post

Offset Policy in Defence Procurement: Recent Developments

To ensure flow of benefits to the domestic industry either by way of transfer of technology to the buyer country or in the form of investments or an obligation on the supplier/vendor to promote local manufacturing, many countries impose conditions of offset while entering into significant defence contracts with suppliers. Following the same rationale, India too adopted an offset policy in 2005. Revised over the years on various counts, the current offset policy (“Offset Policy”) is contained in the Defence Procurement Procedure (“DPP”) 2013.

With a view to boost the domestic defence industry, the Government has since 2015 introduced certain critical amendments to the Offset Policy. A snapshot of the same is given below:

Read full article
ILN Today Post

Keeping pace with changing times

The continued logjam on the effective working of the Parliament and the conflicting self-interest of political parties (at the cost of the nation) ensures that the legislature is unable to perform its key function of legislating new enactments to meet the needs of the changing times. One such important legislation awaiting enactment is the new Consumer Protection Bill, 2015 (“Bill”) in place of the extant The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (“Consumer ProtectionAct”), which was introduced on the floors of the Lok Sabha in 2015 by the Minister of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, Mr. Ram Vilas Paswan.

Read full article
ILN Today Post

LexCounsel Regulatory Update – February 25

Capital Markets/Financial Services:

  • SEBI offers exit route to dissenting shareholders

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has amended the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, to provide an exit opportunity to dissenting shareholders (being at least 10% of the shareholders who voted in the general meeting), who have voted against a resolution for a change in objects or variation in terms of a contract, referred to in the prospectus. Also, the amount to be utilized for the objects for which the prospectus was issued should be less than 75% of the amount raised (including the amount earmarked for general corporate purposes as disclosed in the offer document). Such an exit offer is to be made by the promoters or shareholders in control in control of an issuer making an offer of specified securities. To this end, SEBI has also amended the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2016, to exclude an acquisition of shares or voting rights of a company under the exit route to dissenting shareholders.

Read full article
ILN Today Post

Low Tariff for Solar PV Projects: The Good and the Not So Good

Tariffs for solar power have been falling steadily since 2010 when the Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission (“JNNSM”) was launched – from the lowest tariff of ₹10.95 per kWh, discovered for photovoltaic (“PV”) projects in batch I of phase I of JNNSM, to ₹7.49 per kWh (being the lowest tariff discovered in reverse auctions based on discounted feed-in tariff) for PV projects in batch II of phase I of JNNSM, to a levelised tariff of ₹5.45 per kWh (₹4.95 per kWh in case benefit of accelerated depreciation is availed) for PV projects selected under reverse auctions based on viability gap funding (“VGF”) under batch I of phase II of JNNSM. 

Read full article
ILN Today Post

Approval of National Offshore Wind Energy Policy

The Government of India has approved the National Offshore Wind Energy Policy, a draft of which was earlier released in 2013, to enable optimum exploitation of offshore wind energy in the best interest of the country. Taking a cue from the large number of offshore wind farms in Europe, the Government of India has identified the coastlines of Karnataka, Kerala and Goa as having reasonable offshore wind potential. Preliminary wind resource data gathered from the coastlines of Rameshwaram and Kanyakumari in Tamil Nadu and Gujarat coast also show a potential of about 1 GW.

In terms of the said Policy, the maritime zones in which offshore wind farms can be built are (a) Indian territorial waters, which generally extend up to 12 nautical miles (nm) from the coast baseline; and (b) beyond the 12 nm limit and up to 200 nm (exclusive economic zone (EEZ)), where, under international law, India has the right to construct structures such as wind farm installations – though this may be reserved for research and development activities.

The said Policy also provides for certain fiscal incentives such as a tax holiday for first 10 years of offshore wind power generation, concession in customs duty and exemption in excise duty for procurement of technology and equipment. Exemption from service tax may also be available for services such as resource assessment, environmental impact assessment, oceanographic study by third parties and use of survey vessels and installation vessels.

The Ministry of New & Renewable Energy (MNRE) has been authorized as the Nodal Ministry for use of offshore areas within the EEZ of the country and the National Institute of Wind Energy (NIWE) has been authorized as the Nodal Agency for development of offshore wind energy in the country and to carry out allocation of offshore wind energy blocks, coordination and allied functions with related ministries and agencies. It is expected that the offer of wind energy blocks will be made through an open International Competitive Bidding (ICB) process.

India has already achieved significant success in onshore wind power development, with over 23 GW of wind energy capacity already installed and generating power. The Policy will be applicable throughout India depending on offshore wind potential availability.

Read full article
ILN Today Post

Review of Existing Foreign Direct Investment Policy on Partly Paid Shares and Warrants

It has now been decided to allow partly paid shares and warrants as eligible capital instruments for purposes of FDI. The review of the policy to include warrants and partly-paid shares has been under consideration of the Government for some time now. Prior to this relaxation, warrants and partly paid shares could only be issued to foreign investors only after approval through the Government route, that is, the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (“FIPB”). The definition of “Capital” in the Consolidated FDI Policy Circular of 2015 has accordingly been amended with effect from May 12, 2015 by Press Note NO. 9 (2015) Series. Partly paid shares and warrants may now be issued to foreign investors in terms of the Companies Act, 2013, without the prior approval of the Government, however, subject to terms and conditions as may be stipulated by the Reserve Bank of India from time to time.

In terms of current Reserve Bank of India regulations, prior approval of the FIPB is required where the Indian company’s activity/sector falls the approval route. Otherwise for Indian companies whose activities/sectors are under the automatic route, issue of partly paid shares and warrants do not require any prior regulatory approval. However, pricing of the partly paid equity shares/warrants (and the price/conversion formula for the warrants) has to be determined upfront and 25% of the total consideration amount (including share premium, if any), has to be received upfront. The balance consideration towards fully paid equity shares has to be received within a period of 12 months (18 months in the case of warrants) except where the issue size exceeds Rs. 5 billion and complies with certain conditions.

Read full article
ILN Today Post

India: Regulatory Alerts

Foreign Exchange Management Act:

Card Payments – Relaxation: The Reserve Bank of India has, in terms of its notification no. DPSS.CO.PD.No.2163/02.14.003/2014-2015 of May 14, 2015, relaxed the requirement of additional factor of authentication (AFA) for contactless card (card present) transactions only for a maximum value of Rs. 2,000 per transaction. Beyond this transaction limit, the card has to be processed as a contact payment and authentication with PIN (AFA) will be mandatory. This relaxation does not apply to ATM transactions irrespective of the transaction value, and card not present transactions (CNP). Full text of the notification can be found here.

Read full article
ILN Today Post

Electronic Contracts: Are they legally valid?

With the recent surge in e-commerce, the use of electronic means for executing contracts in India is becoming increasingly common. This brings to the fore the question of whether such electronic contracts (or as more popularly known as e-contracts) can constitute valid contracts under Indian laws.

While the (Indian) Contract Act, 1872 (“ICA”) does not specifically discuss the concept of  “electronic” contracts it does not prohibit them per se. Like any other form of contract, an electronic contract is also primarily governed by the codified provisions of ICA, as applicable to contracts in general.

Read full article
ILN Today Post

Proposals and Way Forward For the Private Equity and Venture Capital Industry Pursuant to Budget 2015

Every year, the budget brings new possibilities and expectations for the industry and this year was no different. The Union Budget (“Budget 2015”) created some positive buzz for the private equity and venture capital funds.

Given below are a few of our preliminary observations on certain proposals put forth by Budget 2015 vis-à-vis the expectations of the private equity and venture capital segment.

Read full article
ILN Today Post

Profits Not a Criteria for Denying Tax Exemptions to Educational Institutions – Supreme Court

The Supreme Court of India has finally laid to rest doubts on availability of tax exemptions to charitable institutions under Section 10(23C) (iiiad) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“IT Act, 1961”). In its recent judgement of March 16, 2015 in the matter of M/s. Queen’s Educational Society vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Civil Appeal No.5167 of 2008), the Apex Court has set aside the judgement of the High Court of Uttarakhand, which had erroneously held that the exemptions granted under Section 10(23C) (iiiad) of the IT Act, 1961, would no longer be available to educational institutions making, “large profits”, even though it may plough such profits back into the purchase of assets for education. The net surplus of the educational institution of approximately Rs. 6.5 Lacs and Rs. 8 Lacs, for the financial years 2000-01 and 2001-02, was deemed enough by the High Court of Uttarakhand, to deny tax exemption under Section 10(23C) (iiiad) of the IT Act, 1961.

Read full article