We are proud to be recognised as world leaders in Dispute Resolution and Corporate/M&A by Chambers Global 2019 which was published today. Chambers and Partners identifies and ranks the most outstanding law firms and lawyers in over 180 jurisdictions throughout the world.
Elke aannemer ziet zich er op enig moment mee geconfronteerd: de niet-betalende opdrachtgever. Zeker indien deze aannemer al investeringen heeft gedaan om een werk te realiseren, kan het uitblijven van betaling vervelende consequenties hebben. Om te voorkomen dat de aannemer volledig met de gebakken peren blijft zitten heeft de wetgever de aannemer – onder omstandigheden – een nuttig hulpmiddel verstrekt: het retentierecht. In deze blog wordt kort stilgestaan bij het retentierecht; wat is het en hoe werkt het?
The World Trademark Review, professional publication annually identifying the most prominent lawyers around the world focused on trademark legal issues, once again lists Lidings’ Managing Partner Andrey Zelenin among the best lawyers in Russia.
Need for a paradigm shift?
23 May 2019 | Chatham House, London
The annual Chatham House Competition Policy conference will assess how a range of public interest considerations — such as unemployment, discrimination or protection of small businesses — and rapidly evolving marketplaces, are reshaping thinking on antitrust policy and the regulation of markets to the extent that changes to the scope and nature of the consumer welfare standard are being advocated.
Confirmed speakers so far include:
- Cecilio Madero Villarejo, Deputy Director-General, DG Competition, European Commission
- Andreas Mundt, President, Bundeskartellamt
- Sarah Cardell, General Counsel, Competition and Markets Authority
- Makan Delrahim, Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division, US Department of Justice
See all speakers and read the agenda on the conference webpage: https://cht.hm/2MlHQXm
Book online: https://cht.hm/2R0S7ZD
Contact: Charlie Burnett Rae – firstname.lastname@example.org or +44 (0)20 7957 5727
In a timeous reminder of the importance of adhering to court deadlines, in BMCE Bank International Plc v Phoenix Commodities PVT Ltd & Anor the court refused an application for relief from sanctions where a costs budget was served late a consequence of which the defaulting party was to be limited to only recovering court fees in the event of success at trial. This was despite an undertaking by the defaulting party’s solicitors to cover both parties’ costs on an indemnity basis for the CCMC and a further CCMC if required, regardless of the outcome of those hearings.
The EU and Japan have today announced a new personal data adequacy agreement between the two parties. This agreement will allow personal data to flow freely between the two parties on the basis that there are strong protective guarantees in place.
‘Practical Completion’ (PC) plays an important role on construction projects, often signifying the release of retention monies, ending the contractor’s liability for liquidated damages, commencing the defects liability period and passing possession of the works to the employer. The term is almost universally used in the construction industry, yet, despite its significance, is not legally defined and is readily left undefined in building contracts. What then does the term PC actually mean? This question was recently considered in Mears v Costplan.
The general meeting of a company can now lawfully amend its previously adopted resolutions. This is especially good news for those shareholders who wish to withdraw extra dividend from their subsidiary mid-year.
Due to an EU directive adopted last year, certain rules on corporate tax are changing with effect from 2019 – including the provisions on interest deduction due to “thin capitalisation.” Although the purpose of the directive was to defeat tax avoidance and tighten up the tax regulations, the new rules on interest deduction are actually becoming more of a blessing than a curse for businesses in Hungary.
The Court of Appeal has handed down another significant judgment on the topic of legal professional privilege. In WH Holding Ltd & Anor v E20 Stadium LLP, the Court clarified that litigation privilege does not extend to purely commercial communications within a company discussing proposals for settlement. The decision also addresses the Court’s approach to applications for inspection where a claim for privilege is challenged.