Asia Pacific

Fair Work Ombudsman targets retirement villages and aged care providers

The Fair Work Ombudsman has today issued a media release highlighting recent examples of non-compliance with Federal workplace laws by employers in the retirement village and aged care industry.  read more

Read full article

Avoiding the common pitfalls when drafting an expert determination clause; The State of NSW v UXC Limited [2011] NSWSC 530

The recent case of The State of NSW v UXC Limited serves as an important reminder to parties of the importance of clarity when it comes to expert determination clauses.  read more

Read full article

Tax credits for fuel and transport emissions: The sting in the carbon price tail

The ‘500 polluters’ tagline has proved popular amongst the commentariat for explaining the reduced coverage of the Gillard Government’s  carbon price mechanism, however, this is only part of the story.  read more…

Read full article

Contracting for a Carbon price: Are you subsidising your competitors?

The federal parliament is one (very significant) step closer to implementing the Carbon Price Mechanism (CPM) and their Clean Energy Future Plan of the Multi-Party Climate Committee.
read more…

Read full article

Clean Energy Bill 2011: The carbon price has landed

The House of Representatives last week passed the Clean Energy Bill 2011 along with 17 other bills which together make up the legislative framework for the Clean Energy Future Plan.
read more…

Read full article

Vioxx appeal successful

On 12 October 2011 the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia, constituted by Chief Justice Keane and Justices Bennett and Gordon JJ (their Honours) allowed an appeal of the Federal Court decision to award compensation to a claimant who claimed consumption of Vioxx caused him to have a heart attack in 2003.  read more

Read full article

Guidelines by SC to Minimize Landlord – Tenant Disputes

SC has recently laid down the following illustrative guidelines and norms for model lease arrangements as a fair measure to reduce litigation between the landlords and the tenants:

(i) The tenant must enhance the rent according to the terms of the agreement or at least by ten percent, after every three years. If the rent is too low (in comparison to market rent), having been fixed almost 20 to 25 years back then the present market rate should be worked out either on the basis of valuation report or reliable estimates of building rentals in the surrounding areas, let out on rent recently.

(ii) Apart from the rental, property tax, water tax, maintenance charges, electricity charges for the actual consumption of the tenanted premises and for common area shall be payable by the tenant. In case there is enhancement in property tax, water tax or maintenance charges, electricity charges then the same shall also be borne by the tenant only.

(iii) The usual maintenance of the premises, except major repairs would be carried out by the tenant only and the same would not be reimbursable by the landlord.

(iv) The major repairs shall be carried out only after obtaining permission from the landlord in writing. The modalities with regard to adjustment of the amount spent thereon should be worked out between the parties.

(v) If present and prevalent market rent assessed and fixed between the parties is paid by the tenant then landlord shall not be entitled to bring any action for his eviction against such a tenant at least for a period of 5 years. Thus for a period of 5 years the tenant shall enjoy immunity from being evicted from the premises.

(vi) The parties shall be at liberty to get the rental fixed by the official valuer or by any other agency, having expertise in the subject.

(vii) The rent so fixed should be just, proper and adequate as per the location, type of construction, accessibility with the main road, parking space facilities available therein etc.

The impact of the judgment remains to be seen in cases where either the long term lease agreements do not specify the above aspects, or where they record an understanding of the parties contrary to the above guidelines. It would be interesting to see how the various courts of India apply this precedence to the eviction related cases being adjudicated by them.

Read full article

Restriction of Sale of Property on Power of Attorney

The Supreme Court of India (“SC”) in a landmark judgment delivered on Wednesday, October 12, 2011, held that the General Power of Attorney (“GPA”) method for sale of immovable property is not a valid form of transfer of property. SC opined that (i) a Power of Attorney is not an instrument of transfer in regard to any right, title or interest in an immovable property; and (ii) property can be lawfully transferred only by way of registered sale deeds.

Reportedly, SC has held that there shall be no mutation of property in revenue and civil records on the basis of Power of Attorney. It is believed that sale of property through GPA result in investment of unaccounted money in real estate business. Property transactions through GPA were evolved, inter alia, to avoid (i) payments of stamp duty and registration charges on sale/conveyance deeds; and (ii) payment of capital gain tax on transfer of capital asset.

Read full article

ATO releases new tax ruling for charities

On 12 October 2011, the ATO released a new tax ruling TR 2011/4 setting out its views on the meaning of ‘charitable’ in the context of determining whether the purpose of an organisation is charitable, including the features distinguishing a charitable institution and a charitable fund, and the circumstances in which an institution or fund will be considered charitable.
This is important to existing charities as it brings alignment between the tax ruling and current operations. read more…

 

Read full article

High Court set standard for expert determination – Shoalhaven City Council v Firedam Civil Engineering Pty Limited

In the recent High Court decision of Shoalhaven City Council v Firedam Civil Engineering Pty Limited[2011] HCA 38, the Court reinforced its trend against setting aside expert determinations except in limited circumstances.  The High Court held that an expert determination, which had been conducted in accordance with the provisions of a contract, expressed to be binding on the parties, generally prevented legal proceedings in respect of the same subject matter.  read more

Read full article