May suspected adverse effect serve as grounds for prohibition of felling? A reply to this question is provided by Law Firm TARK GRUNTE SUTKIENE,the author of the subscriber issue, who have included a summary on the amendments to the regulatory enactments in the first supplement of this year, as well as have supplemented the issue with new knowledge of judicial practice in cases related to felling confirmations.
In one of the cases, the court assessed a dispute, where the felling certificate had been suspended after sale of the growing trees on the strain and the felling rights; while in another case, the court had opted for the nature protection requirements, when refusing the issue of felling confirmation.