The reports of the asset-freezing injunction obtained in London against a member of the Qatari royal family, Sheikh Saud Bin Mohammed Bin Ali Al-Thani, for failing to pay for ancient Greek coins, where he had been the successful bidder at a New York auction, has sparked a lot of interest.
The recession and the conduct of the international rich, particularly from China, has caused a serious rise in payment defaults after auctions. So are asset-freezing orders the answer?
In England you can get such court orders to freeze all assets in England and, if justified the whole world, to support proceedings brought overseas or in England. They are not granted automatically; the court needs to be satisfied that there is a severe risk of dissipation, that is that the assets might be moved or disposed of to frustrate enforcement of an eventual judgment. The court can exercise its power over the defendant and third party asset holders, eg banks, that are within the jurisdiction, over assets they control anywhere in the world, and require disclosure of what assets they hold, or what became of assets previously held.