Let’s say a senior at MIT is about to graduate with a double major in Computer Science and Comparative Media Studies. Career Services tells the student, “You can make six figures at a Manhattan consulting firm, or you can apply to ‘Venture for America.’ Oh, and if selected by Venture for America, you will be sent to a city in need of entrepreneurs. There you will make less than $40,000 a year working for a start-up.” Which would you choose as your first job? Fortunately, in 2013, hundreds of America’s best and brightest college students chose the latter and applied for the seventy fellowships offered by Venture for America.
Building the Entrepreneurs of Tomorrow: A Candid Discussion with the CEO of Venture for America, Andrew Yang
On March 13, 2014, the securities regulatory authorities in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Québec, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Yukon, Northwest Territories, Nunavut and Prince Edward Island adopted a prospectus exemption that will allow issuers listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX), TSX Venture Exchange (TSX-V) and the Canadian Securities Exchange (CSE) to raise money by distributing securities to their existing security holders, subject to certain conditions.
When hoteliers are considering purchasing, selling or remodeling hotels, one of the most overlooked issues during the due diligence and planning phases relates to the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act.
This statute requires covered employers to provide 60 days’ notice to employees, union representatives, state agencies and localities before carrying out plant closings or mass layoffs. Congress intentionally devised WARN to provide affected employees adequate time to prepare for employment loss, seek and obtain alternative employment, and/or arrange for skill training or retraining to compete successfully in the job market.
Florida: Taxpayer permitted to discontinue filing of consolidated tax returns
In a move that is largely unprecedented in the state, the Florida Department of Revenue (the Department) permitted a taxpayer which had been filing as part of a consolidated group to discontinue filing consolidated returns. If your business is already a consolidated filer in Florida or is about to become one, Technical Assistance Advisement 13C1-008 (the Advisement) is perhaps the best non-binding precedent for ceasing to file as a consolidated group.
We have written frequently in this blog about the great many wage-hour class actions filed against employers doing business in California. Those lawsuits often allege that a class of employees performed work off-the-clock, and that the employees are not only entitled to compensation for that time, but to a slew of penalties that often dwarf the amount of alleged damages.
The Screen Artists Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA) Commercials Contract governs wages and benefits for talent appearing in commercial advertising productions. SAG-AFTRA signatories include major marketers, such as P&G, Coca-Cola, and Unilever, as well as most ad agencies. A significant issue for marketers bound by the Commercials Contract is whether branded online video content is properly classified as a “commercial” intended for use on the Internet. More…
The St. Louis office of Lewis, Rice & Fingersh, L.C. is pleased to announce Courtney M. Vomund has joined the Firm’s Corporate Department as a member. Ms. Vomund focuses her practice on ERISA, employee benefits, and executive compensation. Prior to joining Lewis Rice, she was an associate with Polsinelli PC.
“Courtney is an important addition to our growing pension and employee benefits practice,” said Tom Erb, Firm Chairman. “We believe her depth of experience in this area of law will be of great value to our clients.” More…
Thank you for taking the time to read this Howard & Howard Credit Union Regulatory Alert. We aim to provide our credit union clients and friends with information to help you understand and interpret the ever-changing regulatory environment.
The tax authority lost a case related to the VAT treatment of year-end transfer pricing adjustments. The court stated that year-end transfer pricing adjustments share the characteristics of the original transaction; therefore, their VAT treatment is the same as the VAT treatment of the
original transaction. The conclusions of the verdict go beyond the specific case: the judgment shows that, as opposed to the tax authority’s standpoint, the courts follow the logic of the legislator. More…