Regions

Hirst’s Bombay Mix-up

There was an interesting article in The Telegraph last week about a work called Bombay Mix, by Damien Hirst, and the dispute between his certification company, Science Ltd, and a Mr and Mrs Simpson who possess the work.

According to the article, in 1988, Hirst was commissioned to paint Bombay Mix, an early spot painting, on some wallpaper in a house owned by Mr and Mrs Ritblat.  Science claims that, before the house was sold, it was agreed with the Ritblats that in return for the painting being destroyed they would be given an alternative portable painting.  The wall painting was not destroyed and was still on the wall when the house was bought by the Simpsons in 2005.  In 2007, the Simpsons employed specialists to have the painting removed from the wall and mounted on backing board.  The Simpsons now want to sell it.
In the circumstances, Science has refused to issue a certificate of authentication, has claimed ownership and demanded the painting’s return for destruction.
This case raises several issues but, before commenting, I must make two assumptions: that the facts in the article are correct and there are no other relevant facts.  As a lawyer who has had cases reported in the press, I know just how big those assumptions are.
Read full article

California Meal and Rest Break Laws Ensnare Trucking Industry

As if traffic in California was not bad enough by itself, employers in the trucking industry have one more thing to worry about – whether they are complying with California’s meal and rest break laws.  In  Dilts v. Penske Logistics, LLC, the plaintiffs represent a class of delivery drivers and installers.  Defendants had hoped to avoid the claim that they had violated California’s meal and rest break laws by arguing that as “motor carriers” the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (“FAAAA”) preempts California’s meal and rest break laws.  The trial court agreed and granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment.  However,  the Ninth Circuit reversed finding that California’s meal and rest break laws are not the type of laws related to prices, routes, or services that Congress intended to preempt.

Read full article

Stock option plans – What does the employer owe when terminating a key executive?

Stock option plans are a familiar and valued part of the remuneration package of senior executives. When carefully drafted, they incentivize key employees to identify personally with the Company’s success and development, and maintain loyalty and discourage turnover. The Quebec Court of Appeal, in IBM Canada Ltée c. D.C., a decision released on July 7, 2014, has clarified the circumstances when they are (and are not) to be taken account of in calculating what is owed to the departing executive terminated without cause.

Read more…

Read full article

Benefits Litigation Update: Hobby Lobby, Amara, Tibble, and More

Epstein Becker Green and The ERISA Industry Committee (ERIC) have released a new issue of the Benefits Litigation Update.

Featured articles include:

Recent Supreme Court Decisions Revise Rules for Stock Drop Cases
By: Debra Davis, The ERISA Industry Committee

Hobby Lobby and the Questions Left Unanswered
By: John Houston Pope

Post-Amara Landscape Continues to Evolve
By: Scott J. Macey, The ERISA Industry Committee

Supreme Court to Decide Whether A Failed Class Action May Extend
Deadline to Bring Follow-on Claims By Individual Plaintiffs
By: John Houston Pope and Debra Davis

Supreme Court Indicates That It Will Review “Tibble
By: Kenneth J. Kelly

Challenges Could Threaten Individual Subsidies and Employer
Mandate Penalties in States with Federal Exchanges
By: Adam C. Solander

Read more about the Update here or download the full issue in PDF format.

Read full article

WA Certificate of Need Waiver for Psych Beds

The Washington Certificate of Need (“CN”) Program recently announced a temporary change in the CN requirements for acute care hospitals to change the use of existing licensed beds to psychiatric care beds.  Acute care hospitals choosing to convert some of their acute care beds to psychiatric beds will not have to undergo the CN review process. […]

The post WA Certificate of Need Waiver for Psych Beds appeared first on OMW Health Law.

For more information please visit www.omwhealthlaw.com or click on the headline above.

Read full article

Revoking a Will – Destruction of a True Copy Not Sufficient

In Morton v Christian, 2014 BCSC 1303, the British Columbia Supreme Court (the “Court”) grappled with the issue of proper revocation of a Will.  It was determined that the destruction of a true copy of a Will does not satisfy the requirements for revocation when the original is known to be safely kept elsewhere.

In 1989, Mr. Christian and Ms. Morton became romantically involved.  The couple married in Quebec sometime before 1991 and moved to British Columbia, where they lived together until separating in 2009.  Before leaving Quebec, Mr. Christian executed a notarial Will naming Ms. Morton as the sole beneficiary and executrix.

Read full article

Healthcare Alert: Deadline is fast approaching for business associate agreements to comply with HIPAA’s Omnibus Rule

Many organizations, whether business associates, covered entities, or contractors/vendors of business associates, have updated their business associate agreements to comply with the Omnibus Rule. However, many others have not. All business associate agreements must be brought into compliance with the Omnibus Rule by Sept. 23, 2014.

Whether you are a covered entity who deals with business associates or a business associate who provides services to covered entities, you should review all of your business associate arrangements to confirm that you have written business associate agreements in place that comply with the HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules as updated by the Omnibus Rule. Start this process by identifying all of your business associate and contractor/vendor relationships.

Read full article

Healthcare Alert: Questionable laboratory billing practices lead to increased scrutiny

The Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) recently issued findings from its study, Questionable Billing for Medicare Part B Clinical Laboratory Services,” which provides recommendations for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to prevent fraudulent billing practices.

The purpose of the study was to look into questionable billing patterns for laboratory testing because Medicare payments for Part B laboratory services were $8.2 billion in 2010. Part B laboratory services are performed by independent laboratories, laboratories in physician offices, hospital reference laboratories for outpatient services, or other institutional laboratories. In order to be “reasonable or necessary” for purposes of billing Medicare, the laboratory services must be ordered by the treating physician or qualified practitioner.

Read full article

McDonald Hopkins Government Strategies Advisory: This Week in Washington — July 18, 2014

Last week, President Obama asked for $3.7 billion to deal with the current border crisis. This week, House Republicans made it clear that they were not going to give the president what he asked for, and were readying their own plan for how to deal with the current situation.

House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) established a working group to come up with a series of policy proposals aimed at alleviating the crisis on our southern border. While still not finalized, the GOP plan will include a recommendation to dispatch the National Guard to south Texas as well as changes in U.S. law that would expedite the return of unaccompanied children who illegally cross the border.

Read full article

Business Restructuring and Bankruptcy: Defending a preference action: the Ordinary Course of Business defense

What is the “ordinary course of business” defense?

The answer is not as simple as it may seem. Creditors usually believe that nothing they have done falls outside of the ordinary course of business, and the necessary question is simply whether your business dealings with the debtor changed during the 90 days prior to the debtor’s bankruptcy filing. Not surprisingly, the U.S. Bankruptcy Code requires a more complicated analysis with respect to the applicability of the ordinary course of business defense.

Read full article