A laboratory that proposed to waive patient balances for out-of-network laboratory services has been told no. Specifically, the laboratory proposed to contract with physician practices to provide all laboratory services for practice patients, regardless of payor, and agree to waive all fees for patients who are enrollees of certain insurance plans that require them to use a different laboratory. However, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) of the Department of Health and Human Services posted a negative advisory opinion (Advisory Opinion 15-04) on March 25, 2015.
Summary of Conference and Business to Beijing, China
As a follow-up to my recent March 2015 trip to China, I have several observations concerning the status of the EB-5 program and, in particular, the reaction in China with respect to same.
The good news is that the market in China still seems very robust, even with retrogression estimated to take place in May or June. There seems to be a tremendous demand for the EB-5 green card program, notwithstanding the fact that the Chinese nationals are also migrating to other countries around the world that have a much easier entry policy than the United States.
With industry salaries in such a strong place, according to the 2015 PRWeek Salary Survey, it is important PR firms ensure their employment practices minimize potentially costly mistakes. To that end, there are two key areas of current concern: First, keeping the “independence” in the independent contractor relationship. Second, the federal law governing background checks.
How free are freelancers?
More than ever, firms face increased risks of misclassifying workers as independent contractors when the law regards them to be employees. A company’s misclassification of its contractors increases the likelihood of Department of Labor audits and individual or class action lawsuits by workers claiming they are entitled to overtime and other employee benefits, even though they were paid as an independent contractor. More…
The Supreme Court of India has finally laid to rest doubts on availability of tax exemptions to charitable institutions under Section 10(23C) (iiiad) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“IT Act, 1961”). In its recent judgement of March 16, 2015 in the matter of M/s. Queen’s Educational Society vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Civil Appeal No.5167 of 2008), the Apex Court has set aside the judgement of the High Court of Uttarakhand, which had erroneously held that the exemptions granted under Section 10(23C) (iiiad) of the IT Act, 1961, would no longer be available to educational institutions making, “large profits”, even though it may plough such profits back into the purchase of assets for education. The net surplus of the educational institution of approximately Rs. 6.5 Lacs and Rs. 8 Lacs, for the financial years 2000-01 and 2001-02, was deemed enough by the High Court of Uttarakhand, to deny tax exemption under Section 10(23C) (iiiad) of the IT Act, 1961.
March 25, 2015 — The firm is pleased to welcome Jordi Montblanch, who will focus his practice mainly on transportation and administrative law. Jordi was very recently called to the Quebec Bar, a few weeks after becoming a member of the Ontario Bar.
I have examined on this blog the various legal and regulatory issues implicated by telemedicine. Many of those issues involve the practice of medicine and how state medical boards interpret state laws and regulations impacting telemedicine, and how those boards enforce those laws. Believe it or not, a recent Supreme Court case may have an impact on how state boards do their business.
On February 25, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States held that the North Carolina Dental Board (“Board”) was not insulated from federal antitrust liability under the so-called “state action” doctrine when it engaged in anticompetitive conduct to restrain non-dentists from performing teeth whitening services. While the North Carolina case involved a dental board’s attempt to restrict activities of non-dentists, the Court’s opinion has broader implications for how states regulate and supervise professional boards—such as state medical boards. Ultimately, the Supreme Court decision illustrates how an individual or entity, subject to perceived over-regulation by a professional board, might mount a defense by scrutinizing whether the board meets the “state action” requirements to be insulated from liability for anticompetitive regulatory actions. Please click here to read the full EBG Client Alert.
On May 5, 2015, changes to National Instrument 45-106 Prospectus and Registration Exemptions (“NI 45-106”) will come into force which will put additional responsibility on issuers and brokers to take “reasonable steps” to ensure investors who participate in a private placement and who represent themselves as accredited investor or friends and family are in fact eligible for those prospectus exemptions. In addition, the amendments include new documentation requirements for the accredited investor exemption and restrictions on the availability of the minimum amount exemption.
By Angela Blake
On January 29, 2015, the Ontario Securities Commission (the “OSC”) released OSC Staff Notice 51–723, which is a report on its review of related party transaction disclosure filed by 100 randomly selected, Ontario-based issuers. Nearly half of the issuers reviewed received comments from the OSC requesting changes to their management discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) filings. The OSC noted that, while many issuers rely extensively on related party transactions to advance their business on a cost-effective basis by leveraging existing relationships, such transactions have the potential to be unfair to shareholders due to inherent conflicts of interest. Accordingly, it is critical that issuers provide full and adequate disclosure about these transactions so that shareholders can better understand their business purpose and value.
Shannon Baker and Nancy Vianello have become the first designated paralegals at Clark Wilson. By obtaining this designation, which was created and is recognized by the Law Society of BC, Shannon and Nancy are able to provide an additional level of access, responsiveness and value to our clients in the areas of insurance and construction law for Shannon and in the area of strata property law for Nancy. Congratulations, Shannon and Nancy!
Last year the Guangdong Provincial Administration for Industry & Commerce (GDAIC) rendered a decision penalising Huizhou Daya Bay Yiyuan Water Purifying (Yiyuan) for abusing market dominance of bundling services. This is the first case of abuse closed by the GDAIC, and it has far-reaching implications on the enforcement of the Anti-monopoly Law (AML).
Yiyuan is the urban public water supply service provider in two regions, namely West District and Aotou in the Daya Bay District, Huizhou, Guangdong Province. As a public utility provider, Yiyuan is the only firm controlling the urban water supply network in these regions. Yiyuan’s customers, the complainants of the case who are mainly real estate developers, have no alternative to turn to for water supply service. Yiyuan’s feature of public utility not only defines the relevant market as the urban public water supply service market in these regions, but also confers absolute market dominance on Yiyuan in the relevant market. More…